| It is well known that the natural sciences will do | | | | experiments and tests in his laboratory, in some way is |
| everything possible they can at least to reduce the | | | | still saturated with subjectivity no matter how hard he |
| degree of subjectivity as for their field, if not to | | | | attempts to reach his goal. This all is made for the |
| absolutely annihilate it. To the contrary, the society | | | | reason that the personality of a scientist cannot be |
| regards the social sciences as absolutely subjective. | | | | removed no matter what happens because initially he |
| Well, this is really so if we regard both sciences just at | | | | is still a human being, and nothing can be done with it. |
| a glance, but, having a second look at this matter we | | | | Ethical problems, if they occur, may impact greatly the |
| may find out that even the natural sciences may be | | | | subject of study in the natural sciences in many |
| also not delivered from a certain touch of subjectivity | | | | different ways. Political compression, media |
| hidden in it. This pretension is grounded on the following | | | | interference, Church's imbroglio and so on may |
| basics: the scientist, who carries out his experiments | | | | influence the object of study in all natural sciences. This |
| and other vital stuff in the sphere of natural sciences, | | | | impact of different forces in the natural sciences may |
| ethical matters, and choosing of a project in the | | | | in the process implant a subjective point in the object |
| selection of the subject for investigation. | | | | of study being examined. |
| The scientist, who carries out different kinds of | | | | |