Personality psychology

Personality psychology is a branch of psychologybelieved that just three traits - extraversion,
which studies personality and individual differences.neuroticism and psychoticism - were sufficient to
One emphasis in this area is to construct a coherentdescribe human personality. Differences between
picture of a person and his or her major psychologicalCattell and Eysenck emerged due to preferences for
processes. Another emphasis views personality as thedifferent forms of factor analysis, with Cattell using
study of individual differences, in other words, howoblique, Eysenck orthogonal, rotation to analyse the
people differ from each other. A third area offactors that emerged when personality questionnaires
emphasis examines human nature and how all peoplewere subjected to statistical analysis. Today, the Big
are similar to one other. These three viewpoints mergeFive factors have the weight of a considerable
together in the study of personality.amount of empirical research behind them. Building on
Personality can be defined as a dynamic andthe work of Cattell and others, Lewis Goldberg
organized set of characteristics possessed by aproposed a five-dimension personality model,
person that uniquely influences his or her cognitions,nicknamed the "Big Five":
motivations, and behaviors in various situationsExtraversion - outgoing and stimulation-oriented vs.
(Ryckman, 2004). The word "personality" originatesquiet and stimulation-avoiding
from the Latin persona, which means mask.Neuroticism - emotionally reactive, prone to negative
Significantly, in the theatre of the ancient Latin-speakingemotions vs. calm, imperturbable, optimistic
world, the mask was not used as a plot device toAgreeableness - affable, friendly, conciliatory vs.
disguise the identity of a character, but rather was aaggressive, dominant, disagreeable
convention employed to represent or typify thatConscientiousness - dutiful, planful, and orderly vs.
character.laidback, spontaneous, and unreliable
The pioneering American psychologist, Gordon AllportOpenness to experience - open to new ideas and
(1937) described two major ways to study personality,change vs. traditional and oriented toward routine
the idiographic and the nomothetic. NomotheticJohn L. Holland's RIASEC vocational model, commonly
psychology seeks general laws that can be applied toreferred to as the Holland Codes, stipulates that there
many different people, such as the principle ofare six personality traits that lead people to choose
self-actualization, or the trait of extraversion. Idiographictheir career paths. This model is widely used in
psychology is an attempt to understand the uniquevocational counseling and is a circumplex model where
aspects of a particular individual.the six types are represented as a hexagon where
The study of personality has a rich and varied historyadjacent types are more closely related than those
in psychology, with an abundance of theoreticalmore distant.
traditions. Some psychologists have taken a highlyTrait models have been criticized as being purely
scientific approach, whereas others have focused theirdescriptive and offering little explanation of the
attention on theory development. There is also aunderlying causes of personality. Eysenck's theory,
substantial emphasis on the applied field of personalityhowever, does propose biological mechanisms as
testing.driving traits, and modern behavior genetics
Philosophical assumptionsresearchers have demonstrated a clear genetic
Many of the ideas developed by historical and modernsubstrate to them. Another potential weakness with
Personality Theorists stem from basic philosophicaltrait theories is that they lead people to accept
assumptions they hold. Psychology is not a purelyoversimplified classifications, or worse offer advice,
empirical discipline, as it brings in elements of art,based on a superficial analysis of one's personality.
science, and philosophy to draw general conclusions.Finally, trait models often underestimate the effect of
The following five categories are some of the mostspecific situations on people's behavior. It is important
fundamental philosophical assumptions where theoriststo remember that traits are statistical generalizations
disagree:that do not always correspond to an individual's
Freedom versus Determinismbehavior.
The debate over whether we have control over ourType theories
own behavior and understand the motives behind itPersonality type refers to the psychological
(Freedom), or if our behavior is basically determined byclassification of different types of people. Personality
some other force over which we might not havetypes are distinguished from personality traits, which
control (Determinism). We may merely respond tocome in different levels or degrees. According to type
external forces like government, parents, professors,theories, for example, there are two types of people,
the economic system, etc; or we may even beintroverts and extraverts. According to trait theories,
constrained to behave in certain ways by our genetics,introversion and extraversion are part of a continuous
upbringing, etc.dimension, with many people in the middle. The idea of
Heredity versus Environmentpsychological types originated in the theoretical work
The nature vs. nurture debate. Is personalityof Carl Jung.
determined largely by genetics and heredity, or byBuilding on the writings and observations of Carl Jung,
environment and experiences? There is evidence forduring WWII Isabel Briggs Myers and her mother
both sides, and the field of behavior genetics hasKatharine C. Briggs delineated personality types by
demonstrated interesting new results in this area, suchconstructing the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. This
as the importance of unshared environmental effectsmodel was later elaborated further by David Keirsey. It
(such as individual experiences) over sharedis an older, more theoretical approach to personality,
environmental effects (such as family andaccepting Extraversion vs. Introversion as basic and
demographics). Furthermore, twin studies indicate thatfurther adding three more dimensions:
there is a substantial genetic contribution to mostExtraversion vs. Introversion (see above)
personality traits.Intuition vs. Sensing (trust in conceptual/abstract models
Uniqueness versus Universalityof reality versus concrete sensory-oriented facts)
The argument over whether we are all uniqueThinking vs. Feeling (thinking as the prime-mover in
individuals (Uniqueness) or if humans are basicallydecision-making vs. feelings as the prime-mover in
similar in their nature (Universality).decision-making)
Proactive versus ReactivePerceiving vs. Judging (desire to perceive events vs.
Do we primarily act through our own initiativedesire to have things done so judgements can be
(Proactive), or do we react to outside stimulimade)
(Reactive)?This personality typology has some aspects of a trait
Optimistic versus Pessimistictheory: it explains people's behaviour in terms of
Finally, whether or not we can alter our personalitiesopposite fixed characteristics. In these more traditional
(Optimistic) or if they remain the same throughout ourmodels, the intuition factor is considered the most
whole lives (Pessimistic).basic, dividing people into "N" or "S" personality types.
Personality theoriesAn "N" is further assumed to be guided by the thinking
There are several theoretical perspectives onor objectication habit, or feelings, and be divided into
personality in psychology, which involve different ideas"NT" (scientist, engineer) or "NF" (author,
about the relationship between personality and otherhuman-oriented leader) personality. An "S", by contrast,
psychological constructs, as well as different theoriesis assumed to be more guided by the perception axis,
about the way personality develops.and thus divided into "SP" (performer, craftsman,
Critics of personality theory claim that personality isartisan) and "SJ" (guardian, accountant, bureaucrat)
"plastic" across time, places, moods, and situations.personality. These four are considered basic, with the
Changes in personality may indeed result from diet (orother two factors in each case (including always
lack thereof), medical effects, significant events, orextraversion) less important. Critics of this traditional
learning. However, most personality theoriesview have observed that the types are quite strongly
emphasize stability over fluctuation.stereotyped by professions, and thus may arise more
Trait theoriesfrom the need to categorize people for purposes of
According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual ofguiding their career choice. This among other
the American Psychiatric Association, personality traitsobjections led to the emergence of the five factor
are "enduring patterns of perceiving, relating to, andview, which is less concerned with behavior under
thinking about the environment and oneself that arework stress and more concerned with behavior in
exhibited in a wide range of social and personalpersonal and emotional circumstances. Some critics
contexts." Theorists generally assume that a) traits arehave argued for more or fewer dimensions while
relatively stable over time, b) traits differ amongothers have proposed entirely different theories (often
individuals (e.g. some people are outgoing while othersassuming different definitions of "personality").
are shy), and c) traits influence behavior.Type A personality: During the 1950s, Meyer Friedman
The most common models of traits incorporate threeand his co-workers defined what they called Type A
to five broad dimensions or factors. The leastand Type B behavior patterns. They theorized that
controversial dimension, observed as far back as theintense, hard-driving Type A personalities had a higher
ancient Greeks, is simply extraversion vs. introversionrisk of coronary disease because they are "stress
(outgoing and physical-stimulation-oriented vs. quiet andjunkies." Type B people, on the other hand, tended to
physical-stimulation-averse).be relaxed, less competitive, and lower in risk. There
Gordon Allport delineated different kinds of traits, whichwas also a Type AB mixed profile. Dr. Redford
he also called dispositions. Central traits are basic to anWilliams, cardiologist at Duke University, refuted
individual's personality, while secondary traits are moreFriedman’s theory that Type
peripheral. Common traits are those recognized withinA personalities have a higher risk of coronary heart
a culture and thus may vary from culture to culture.disease; however, current research indicates that the
Cardinal traits are those by which an individual may behostility component of Type A may have health
strongly recognized.implications. Type A/B theory has been extensively
Raymond Cattell's research propagated a two-tieredcriticized by psychologists because it tends to
personality structure with sixteen "primary factors" (16oversimplify the many dimensions of an individual's
Personality Factors) and five "secondary factors." Apersonality.
different model was proposed by Hans Eysenck, who