Different types of psychology


Personality psychology

Personality psychology is a branch ofdescribe human personality. Differences
psychology which studies personality andbetween Cattell and Eysenck emerged due
individual differences. One emphasis into preferences for different forms of
this area is to construct a coherentfactor analysis, with Cattell using
picture of a person and his or her majoroblique, Eysenck orthogonal, rotation to
psychological processes. Anotheranalyse the factors that emerged when
emphasis views personality as the studypersonality questionnaires were
of individual differences, in othersubjected to statistical analysis.
words, how people differ from eachToday, the Big Five factors have the
other. A third area of emphasis examinesweight of a considerable amount of
human nature and how all people areempirical research behind them. Building
similar to one other. These threeon the work of Cattell and others, Lewis
viewpoints merge together in the studyGoldberg proposed a five-dimension
of personality.personality model, nicknamed the "Big
Personality can be defined as a dynamicFive":
and organized set of characteristicsExtraversion - outgoing and
possessed by a person that uniquelystimulation-oriented vs. quiet and
influences his or her cognitions,stimulation-avoiding
motivations, and behaviors in variousNeuroticism - emotionally reactive,
situations (Ryckman, 2004). The wordprone to negative emotions vs. calm,
"personality" originates from the Latinimperturbable, optimistic
persona, which means mask.Agreeableness - affable, friendly,
Significantly, in the theatre of theconciliatory vs. aggressive, dominant,
ancient Latin-speaking world, the maskdisagreeable
was not used as a plot device toConscientiousness - dutiful, planful,
disguise the identity of a character,and orderly vs. laidback, spontaneous,
but rather was a convention employed toand unreliable
represent or typify that character.Openness to experience - open to new
The pioneering American psychologist,ideas and change vs. traditional and
Gordon Allport (1937) described twooriented toward routine
major ways to study personality, theJohn L. Holland's RIASEC vocational
idiographic and the nomothetic.model, commonly referred to as the
Nomothetic psychology seeks general lawsHolland Codes, stipulates that there are
that can be applied to many differentsix personality traits that lead people
people, such as the principle ofto choose their career paths. This model
self-actualization, or the trait ofis widely used in vocational counseling
extraversion. Idiographic psychology isand is a circumplex model where the six
an attempt to understand the uniquetypes are represented as a hexagon where
aspects of a particular individual.adjacent types are more closely related
The study of personality has a rich andthan those more distant.
varied history in psychology, with anTrait models have been criticized as
abundance of theoretical traditions.being purely descriptive and offering
Some psychologists have taken a highlylittle explanation of the underlying
scientific approach, whereas others havecauses of personality. Eysenck's theory,
focused their attention on theoryhowever, does propose biological
development. There is also a substantialmechanisms as driving traits, and modern
emphasis on the applied field ofbehavior genetics researchers have
personality testing.demonstrated a clear genetic substrate
Philosophical assumptionsto them. Another potential weakness with
Many of the ideas developed bytrait theories is that they lead people
historical and modern Personalityto accept oversimplified
Theorists stem from basic philosophicalclassifications, or worse offer advice,
assumptions they hold. Psychology is notbased on a superficial analysis of one's
a purely empirical discipline, as itpersonality. Finally, trait models often
brings in elements of art, science, andunderestimate the effect of specific
philosophy to draw general conclusions.situations on people's behavior. It is
The following five categories are someimportant to remember that traits are
of the most fundamental philosophicalstatistical generalizations that do not
assumptions where theorists disagree:always correspond to an individual's
Freedom versus Determinismbehavior.
The debate over whether we have controlType theories
over our own behavior and understand thePersonality type refers to the
motives behind it (Freedom), or if ourpsychological classification of
behavior is basically determined by somedifferent types of people. Personality
other force over which we might not havetypes are distinguished from personality
control (Determinism). We may merelytraits, which come in different levels
respond to external forces likeor degrees. According to type theories,
government, parents, professors, thefor example, there are two types of
economic system, etc; or we may even bepeople, introverts and extraverts.
constrained to behave in certain ways byAccording to trait theories,
our genetics, upbringing, etc.introversion and extraversion are part
Heredity versus Environmentof a continuous dimension, with many
The nature vs. nurture debate. Ispeople in the middle. The idea of
personality determined largely bypsychological types originated in the
genetics and heredity, or by environmenttheoretical work of Carl Jung.
and experiences? There is evidence forBuilding on the writings and
both sides, and the field of behaviorobservations of Carl Jung, during WWII
genetics has demonstrated interestingIsabel Briggs Myers and her mother
new results in this area, such as theKatharine C. Briggs delineated
importance of unshared environmentalpersonality types by constructing the
effects (such as individual experiences)Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. This model
over shared environmental effects (suchwas later elaborated further by David
as family and demographics).Keirsey. It is an older, more
Furthermore, twin studies indicate thattheoretical approach to personality,
there is a substantial geneticaccepting Extraversion vs. Introversion
contribution to most personality traits.as basic and further adding three more
Uniqueness versus Universalitydimensions:
The argument over whether we are allExtraversion vs. Introversion (see
unique individuals (Uniqueness) or ifabove)
humans are basically similar in theirIntuition vs. Sensing (trust in
nature (Universality).conceptual/abstract models of reality
Proactive versus Reactiveversus concrete sensory-oriented facts)
Do we primarily act through our ownThinking vs. Feeling (thinking as the
initiative (Proactive), or do we reactprime-mover in decision-making vs.
to outside stimuli (Reactive)?feelings as the prime-mover in
Optimistic versus Pessimisticdecision-making)
Finally, whether or not we can alter ourPerceiving vs. Judging (desire to
personalities (Optimistic) or if theyperceive events vs. desire to have
remain the same throughout our wholethings done so judgements can be made)
lives (Pessimistic).This personality typology has some
Personality theoriesaspects of a trait theory: it explains
There are several theoreticalpeople's behaviour in terms of opposite
perspectives on personality infixed characteristics. In these more
psychology, which involve differenttraditional models, the intuition factor
ideas about the relationship betweenis considered the most basic, dividing
personality and other psychologicalpeople into "N" or "S" personality
constructs, as well as differenttypes. An "N" is further assumed to be
theories about the way personalityguided by the thinking or objectication
develops.habit, or feelings, and be divided into
Critics of personality theory claim that"NT" (scientist, engineer) or "NF"
personality is "plastic" across time,(author, human-oriented leader)
places, moods, and situations. Changespersonality. An "S", by contrast, is
in personality may indeed result fromassumed to be more guided by the
diet (or lack thereof), medical effects,perception axis, and thus divided into
significant events, or learning."SP" (performer, craftsman, artisan) and
However, most personality theories"SJ" (guardian, accountant, bureaucrat)
emphasize stability over fluctuation.personality. These four are considered
Trait theoriesbasic, with the other two factors in
According to the Diagnostic andeach case (including always
Statistical Manual of the Americanextraversion) less important. Critics of
Psychiatric Association, personalitythis traditional view have observed that
traits are "enduring patterns ofthe types are quite strongly stereotyped
perceiving, relating to, and thinkingby professions, and thus may arise more
about the environment and oneself thatfrom the need to categorize people for
are exhibited in a wide range of socialpurposes of guiding their career choice.
and personal contexts." TheoristsThis among other objections led to the
generally assume that a) traits areemergence of the five factor view, which
relatively stable over time, b) traitsis less concerned with behavior under
differ among individuals (e.g. somework stress and more concerned with
people are outgoing while others arebehavior in personal and emotional
shy), and c) traits influence behavior.circumstances. Some critics have argued
The most common models of traitsfor more or fewer dimensions while
incorporate three to five broadothers have proposed entirely different
dimensions or factors. The leasttheories (often assuming different
controversial dimension, observed as fardefinitions of "personality").
back as the ancient Greeks, is simplyType A personality: During the 1950s,
extraversion vs. introversion (outgoingMeyer Friedman and his co-workers
and physical-stimulation-oriented vs.defined what they called Type A and Type
quiet and physical-stimulation-averse).B behavior patterns. They theorized that
Gordon Allport delineated differentintense, hard-driving Type A
kinds of traits, which he also calledpersonalities had a higher risk of
dispositions. Central traits are basiccoronary disease because they are
to an individual's personality, while"stress junkies." Type B people, on the
secondary traits are more peripheral.other hand, tended to be relaxed, less
Common traits are those recognizedcompetitive, and lower in risk. There
within a culture and thus may vary fromwas also a Type AB mixed profile. Dr.
culture to culture. Cardinal traits areRedford Williams, cardiologist at Duke
those by which an individual may beUniversity, refuted Friedman’s
strongly recognized.theory that Type A personalities have a
Raymond Cattell's research propagated ahigher risk of coronary heart disease;
two-tiered personality structure withhowever, current research indicates that
sixteen "primary factors" (16the hostility component of Type A may
Personality Factors) and five "secondaryhave health implications. Type A/B
factors." A different model was proposedtheory has been extensively criticized
by Hans Eysenck, who believed that justby psychologists because it tends to
three traits - extraversion, neuroticismoversimplify the many dimensions of an
and psychoticism - were sufficient toindividual's personality.



1 A B C D 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103