Different types of psychology


Personality psychology

Personality psychology is a branch ofmodel was proposed by Hans Eysenck, who
psychology which studies personality andbelieved that just three traits -
individual differences. One emphasis in thisextraversion, neuroticism and psychoticism -
area is to construct a coherent picture of awere sufficient to describe human
person and his or her major psychologicalpersonality. Differences between Cattell and
processes. Another emphasis views personalityEysenck emerged due to preferences for
as the study of individual differences, indifferent forms of factor analysis, with
other words, how people differ from eachCattell using oblique, Eysenck orthogonal,
other. A third area of emphasis examinesrotation to analyse the factors that emerged
human nature and how all people are similarwhen personality questionnaires were
to one other. These three viewpoints mergesubjected to statistical analysis. Today, the
together  in  the  study  of  personality.Big Five factors have the weight of a
considerable amount of empirical research
Personality can be defined as a dynamic andbehind them. Building on the work of Cattell
organized set of characteristics possessed byand others, Lewis Goldberg proposed a
a person that uniquely influences his or herfive-dimension personality model, nicknamed
cognitions, motivations, and behaviors inthe  "Big  Five":
various situations (Ryckman, 2004). The word
"personality" originates from the LatinExtraversion - outgoing and
persona, which means mask. Significantly, instimulation-oriented vs. quiet and
the theatre of the ancient Latin-speakingstimulation-avoiding
world, the mask was not used as a plot device
to disguise the identity of a character, butNeuroticism - emotionally reactive, prone to
rather was a convention employed to representnegative emotions vs. calm, imperturbable,
or  typify  that  character.optimistic
The pioneering American psychologist, GordonAgreeableness - affable, friendly,
Allport (1937) described two major ways toconciliatory vs. aggressive, dominant,
study personality, the idiographic and thedisagreeable
nomothetic. Nomothetic psychology seeks
general laws that can be applied to manyConscientiousness - dutiful, planful, and
different people, such as the principle oforderly vs. laidback, spontaneous, and
self-actualization, or the trait ofunreliable
extraversion. Idiographic psychology is an
attempt to understand the unique aspects of aOpenness to experience - open to new ideas
particular  individual.and change vs. traditional and oriented
toward  routine
The study of personality has a rich and
varied history in psychology, with anJohn L. Holland's RIASEC vocational model,
abundance of theoretical traditions. Somecommonly referred to as the Holland Codes,
psychologists have taken a highly scientificstipulates that there are six personality
approach, whereas others have focused theirtraits that lead people to choose their
attention on theory development. There iscareer paths. This model is widely used in
also a substantial emphasis on the appliedvocational counseling and is a circumplex
field  of  personality  testing.model where the six types are represented as
a hexagon where adjacent types are more
Philosophical  assumptionsclosely  related  than  those  more distant.
Many of the ideas developed by historical andTrait models have been criticized as being
modern Personality Theorists stem from basicpurely descriptive and offering little
philosophical assumptions they hold.explanation of the underlying causes of
Psychology is not a purely empiricalpersonality. Eysenck's theory, however, does
discipline, as it brings in elements of art,propose biological mechanisms as driving
science, and philosophy to draw generaltraits, and modern behavior genetics
conclusions. The following five categoriesresearchers have demonstrated a clear genetic
are some of the most fundamentalsubstrate to them. Another potential weakness
philosophical assumptions where theoristswith trait theories is that they lead people
disagree:to accept oversimplified classifications, or
worse offer advice, based on a superficial
Freedom  versus  Determinismanalysis of one's personality. Finally, trait
models often underestimate the effect of
The debate over whether we have control overspecific situations on people's behavior. It
our own behavior and understand the motivesis important to remember that traits are
behind it (Freedom), or if our behavior isstatistical generalizations that do not
basically determined by some other force overalways correspond to an individual's
which we might not have controlbehavior.
(Determinism). We may merely respond to
external forces like government, parents,Type  theories
professors, the economic system, etc; or we
may even be constrained to behave in certainPersonality type refers to the psychological
ways  by  our  genetics,  upbringing,  etc.classification of different types of people.
Personality types are distinguished from
Heredity  versus  Environmentpersonality traits, which come in different
levels or degrees. According to type
The nature vs. nurture debate. Is personalitytheories, for example, there are two types of
determined largely by genetics and heredity,people, introverts and extraverts. According
or by environment and experiences? There isto trait theories, introversion and
evidence for both sides, and the field ofextraversion are part of a continuous
behavior genetics has demonstrateddimension, with many people in the middle.
interesting new results in this area, such asThe idea of psychological types originated in
the importance of unshared environmentalthe  theoretical  work  of  Carl  Jung.
effects (such as individual experiences) over
shared environmental effects (such as familyBuilding on the writings and observations of
and demographics). Furthermore, twin studiesCarl Jung, during WWII Isabel Briggs Myers
indicate that there is a substantial geneticand her mother Katharine C. Briggs delineated
contribution  to  most  personality  traits.personality types by constructing the
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. This model was
Uniqueness  versus  Universalitylater elaborated further by David Keirsey. It
is an older, more theoretical approach to
The argument over whether we are all uniquepersonality, accepting Extraversion vs.
individuals (Uniqueness) or if humans areIntroversion as basic and further adding
basically similar in their naturethree  more  dimensions:
(Universality).
Extraversion  vs.  Introversion  (see above)
Proactive  versus  Reactive
Intuition vs. Sensing (trust in conceptual
Do we primarily act through our ownabstract models of reality versus concrete
initiative (Proactive), or do we react tosensory-oriented  facts)
outside  stimuli  (Reactive)?
Thinking vs. Feeling (thinking as the
Optimistic  versus  Pessimisticprime-mover in decision-making vs. feelings
as  the  prime-mover  in  decision-making)
Finally, whether or not we can alter our
personalities (Optimistic) or if they remainPerceiving vs. Judging (desire to perceive
the same throughout our whole livesevents vs. desire to have things done so
(Pessimistic).judgements  can  be  made)
Personality  theoriesThis personality typology has some aspects of
a trait theory: it explains people's
There are several theoretical perspectives onbehaviour in terms of opposite fixed
personality in psychology, which involvecharacteristics. In these more traditional
different ideas about the relationshipmodels, the intuition factor is considered
between personality and other psychologicalthe most basic, dividing people into "N" or
constructs, as well as different theories"S" personality types. An "N" is further
about  the  way  personality  develops.assumed to be guided by the thinking or
objectication habit, or feelings, and be
Critics of personality theory claim thatdivided into "NT" (scientist, engineer) or
personality is "plastic" across time, places,"NF" (author, human-oriented leader)
moods, and situations. Changes in personalitypersonality. An "S", by contrast, is assumed
may indeed result from diet (or lackto be more guided by the perception axis, and
thereof), medical effects, significantthus divided into "SP" (performer, craftsman,
events, or learning. However, mostartisan) and "SJ" (guardian, accountant,
personality theories emphasize stability overbureaucrat) personality. These four are
fluctuation.considered basic, with the other two factors
in each case (including always extraversion)
Trait  theoriesless important. Critics of this traditional
view have observed that the types are quite
According to the Diagnostic and Statisticalstrongly stereotyped by professions, and thus
Manual of the American Psychiatricmay arise more from the need to categorize
Association, personality traits are "enduringpeople for purposes of guiding their career
patterns of perceiving, relating to, andchoice. This among other objections led to
thinking about the environment and oneselfthe emergence of the five factor view, which
that are exhibited in a wide range of socialis less concerned with behavior under work
and personal contexts." Theorists generallystress and more concerned with behavior in
assume that a) traits are relatively stablepersonal and emotional circumstances. Some
over time, b) traits differ among individualscritics have argued for more or fewer
(e.g. some people are outgoing while othersdimensions while others have proposed
are  shy),  and c) traits influence behavior.entirely different theories (often assuming
different  definitions  of  "personality").
The most common models of traits incorporate
three to five broad dimensions or factors.Type A personality: During the 1950s, Meyer
The least controversial dimension, observedFriedman and his co-workers defined what they
as far back as the ancient Greeks, is simplycalled Type A and Type B behavior patterns.
extraversion vs. introversion (outgoing andThey theorized that intense, hard-driving
physical-stimulation-oriented vs. quiet andType A personalities had a higher risk of
physical-stimulation-averse).coronary disease because they are "stress
junkies." Type B people, on the other hand,
Gordon Allport delineated different kinds oftended to be relaxed, less competitive, and
traits, which he also called dispositions.lower in risk. There was also a Type AB mixed
Central traits are basic to an individual'sprofile. Dr. Redford Williams, cardiologist
personality, while secondary traits are moreat Duke University, refuted
peripheral. Common traits are thoseFriedman’s theory that Type
recognized within a culture and thus may varyA personalities have a higher risk of
from culture to culture. Cardinal traits arecoronary heart disease; however, current
those by which an individual may be stronglyresearch indicates that the hostility
recognized.component of Type A may have health
implications. Type A/B theory has been
Raymond Cattell's research propagated aextensively criticized by psychologists
two-tiered personality structure with sixteenbecause it tends to oversimplify the many
"primary factors" (16 Personality Factors)dimensions of an individual's personality.
and five "secondary factors." A different



1 A B C D 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103