Comparative Ratings (health Psychology Research)

Examining the impact of downward comparisons,comparison, and show that nondepressed people, in
many studies have assessed social comparisons bygeneral, tend to see themselves as superior to others,
asking individuals to rate their situation in comparison towhereas the self-perception of depressed individuals is
that of others. Tennen and Affleck refer to suchmore likely to include perceptions of inferiority. The
measures as comparison conclusions, Wood andinfluence of comparative evaluations on subjective
VanderZee use the term comparative ratings,well-being is discussed in detail in chapter 11 by Diener
whereas Buunk used the term relative evaluations.and Fujita.
Diener and Fujita and Wood and VanderZee argueWe would suggest, that simply believing that there are
that such comparative ratings may not reflect theothers who are worse off is likely to benefit almost
outcome of a comparison process at all, but -- moreanyone who is experiencing problems. What this
so than other measuressomething else, such as asuggests is that a belief that one is relatively well off,
positive mood. Although the meaning of comparativewhich comes about through downward comparison, is
ratings may not be completely unambiguous, thean important step along the way to satisfactory
evidence for positive associations between well-beingadjustment. Although we cannot make a definitive
and a feeling of being better off than most others isstatement at this point in time (and, indeed, the topic
rather strong. To give just a few examples, Heidrichcontinues to generate a considerable amount of
and Ryff, Buunk, and VanderZee, Buunk, andcontroversy and investigation), the research presented
Sanderman all found that psychological well-being isin this volume does shed considerable light on the issue
affected directly by the perception of being better offof when downward comparisons will have favorable
than similar others, independent of physical health. Eveneffects. In a nutshell, this research suggests that
more convincing, Affleck, Tennen, Pfeiffer, Fifield, andindividuals are likely to receive some emotional benefit
Rowe showed that persons with rheumatoid arthritisfrom such comparisons when they engage in some
who thought their illness was less severe than that ofform of counterfactual thinking vis à vis the
other victims were rated by health care providers astarget, that is, when they believe there was, or is,
more positively adjusted, even when data analysissome possibility that their own situation could have
controlled for the effects of disease activity, duration,resembled that of the target but in fact will, or does,
and functional status of the patients. More generally,not. One implication of this is that individuals who
Tennen and Affleck point out that the conclusion thatbelieve their own situation will decline (such as those
others are worse off is typically associated withwho are terminally ill or those who are depressed) are
positive adjustment. In a similar vein, Ahrens and Alloynot likely to benefit from comparison with others who
discuss the relation between depression and socialare more ill.