Treating Mental Health and Forensic Populations

No longer is it possible to assess and/or treat a mentalproblems that have been derived from statistical
health population without also interfacing with forensicmodels (actuarial tools) should be part of the evaluation
issues such as legal infractions, Courts, violence, sexualsince clinical assessment of risk of future
behavior problems, delinquency, crime, Not Guilty bydangerousness is only a little better than chance. While
Reason of Insanity, substance abuse, and others. Therisk assessments are not perfect, they are better than
training and approaches to the mental health populationclinical judgment in this area.How are Interventions
is different than that for a forensic population. So whatDifferent?Major Mental Illnesses, while often chronic,
is to be done, if a person has both issues? We mustcan often be very effectively treated with medication
be cross trained for dually affected clients.How Areand therapy. At the higher functioning end of the
the Populations DifferentA Mental Health population iscontinuum, therapy can be supportive,
comprised primarily Axis I disorders, such as Bipolarpsychotherapeutic, family, or cognitive behavioral.
Disorder, Schizophrenia, Major Depression, PTSD, andTherapists are trained to accept what the client
Anxiety Disorders. Daily functioning is on a continuum.presents and start where the client is functioning and
Recovery is quick for some and slow for others and ishow the client sees the world. The clients are usually
also on a continuum. Well controlled intermittent, mild toself-motivated and seek therapy voluntarily. They
moderate episodes of a mood or anxiety disorder willaccept responsibility for their behaviors and for making
not necessarily interfere with daily functioning.changes in their lives. Use of a strengths model is
Someone with severe, chronic Schizophrenia or Moodoften very effective. Many people recover fully and
Disorder requiring periodic hospitalizations andlead quite "normal," non-disrupted lives. When someone
extensive community support, will have impairment inis on the lower end of the continuum, with major
daily functioning. Goals for these folks are oftendisruption in every day functioning (work and
pro-social and involve being an active member offamily),despite medication and therapy, major supports
society. A therapist can be fairly sure that the mentalfor housing, jobs, and activities of daily living and
health client without forensic issues will be relativelymedication are needed for a very long time, perhaps a
honest in his or her interactions and the therapist canlife time. However, their life goals are often still
take most of what he/she says at face value. Anpro-social. Serlf-directed care works well with the
emphasis on a strengths model works well when nomental health population without Axis II diagnoses.In the
personality disorder is involved.A forensic populationarea of intervention, different approaches are needed
can be defined as having personality disorders,for the forensic population. Some level of social and
interpersonal difficulties, behavioral problems, multiplefamily dysfunction is generally intergenerational and
problems and life long courses of various levels oflifelong. These clients are often Court ordered to an
dysfunction or difficulty. Again, this population fills the fullassessment or therapy or they are having significant
spectrum of effective daily functioning. However, socialproblems at work or within the family causing others to
functioning is often the most severe impairment. Thereseek assessment or therapy for them. They do not
are issues of trust, appropriate relationships, egoalways accept responsibility for their actions or for
centrism, moral development, honesty, manipulation, andchanging. There are skill deficits that need to be
danger to self and others. They often have a negativeaddressed, such as social skills, anger management,
view of themselves and others, especially authorityand problem solving. You cannot take what these
figures. Moral development is often delayed leavingclients say at face value. Third party information is
them at the egocentric stage of development. Thisalways needed. This is because you need to trust
means that what serves the self is what matters andsomeone in order to be honest with them and most of
empathy for others and the ability to have an honestthese folks have been abused, neglected, or exposed
relationship with another person may not yet haveto domestic violence and a suspicious arm's length
developed. Their goals are often self-serving.Thetreatment of others is a coping strategy that is difficult
capacity to understand the importance of the bestto give up.This population often has multiple problems
interest of the group through laws and rules that weso that Multi-systemic Therapy that approaches many
voluntarily follow, may not be well understood. Many, ifareas that need to be addressed is often effective
not most, have histories of childhood abuse, neglect, or(treating the whole person). Group work and trauma
exposure to domestic violence. The assessment andtherapies are also good tools. Self-directed therapy
interventions with this population is necessarily differentmay not be effective because of the need to protect
that those for a people with no Axis II disorder or trait.oneself from what may appear to be an unsafe world.
The people with forensic issues do not always tell theNurturing, setting good boundaries, and structure are
truth because of their lack of trust in relationships. Theessential in this work. Motivational interviewing and
therapist cannot take what he/she says at face value.stages of change can be very helpful. When clients
The therapist must separate the sincere from thehave issues in the mental health and forensic arenas,
manipulative moves for self-gain. The internalboth approaches must be used to the extent
boundaries are such that they need the therapist topossible.ConclusionsClients in a mental health setting
put external boundaries into place for them. Informationrange from the single diagnosis of a major mental
must be checked with other sources ofIllness to the dual diagnosis of a major mental illness
information.How Assessment Tools DifferIn a mentaland a personality disorder and/or forensic/legal issue.
health population, assessment can quite effectively beThe approaches to these dissimilar populations is
done through instruments such as the MMPI-A, BASC,unique when clients are dually diagnosed, both
and MACI. These self-report tools are quite sufficientapproaches are needed. Assessments and treatment
for this population and will elucidate psychologicalfor a mental health population can be self-directed and
dynamics and mental illness, if present. Self-report isstrengths based.However, the approach for the
not as much of an issue as it is in the forensicforensic population cannot be self-directed because
population, where third party verification is morethe client's goals are often antisocial and by definition
important. However when a youth has multiplecounter to the best interests of society. The therapist
problems, both mental health and forensic, aor evaluator cannot accept everything the client says
combination of tools is preferred.Forensic evaluationat face value because not being honest is part of the
tools rely less on self-report because of the trustdisorder that the therapist is treating. Motivational
issues and because it is not always in the client's bestinterviewing seems to blend the views of traditional
interest to be completely truthful. Self-reportmental health and forensics in a way that is beneficial
assessment instruments can be used, but third partyfor the client and society.Dr. Kathryn Seifert has over
and official reports should also be used in the30 years experience in mental health, addictions, and
evaluation phase of a forensic assessment. Courtscriminal justice work. She has authored the CARE and
are concerned with public safety, therefore, the neednumerous articles. Dr. Seifert has lectured internationally
for tools that assess future risk of dangerousness toon youth and family violence and trauma.
others. Risk of future aggression and sexual behavior