Why a Mental Disability Isn't That Strange

Mental Health Empowerment, Partnership andillness and lives. And the service must stop holding the
Recovery: Ideal or Reality?illness for them, and start holding the hope. Not the
Mao Tse-Tung is not an obvious inspiration for therecovery, though, because the recovery is the context:
empowerment, partnership and recovery of mentalit holds us.
health services and service users but it was readingEmbracing recovery will transform the way staff and
"Mao - The Unknown Story", the astounding biographyservices work. Services, like its service users, may go
by Jang Chung and her husband of Red China'sthrough stages of self-acceptance, self-awareness,
infamous tyrant that I found a quotation that sums upself-forgiveness and be willing to release old
for me the attitude most conducive to both: "Ideals arepreconceptions and patterns. Service users should be
important, but reality is even more important." In mytrained to support each other in recovery and support
opinion, which is admittedly uninformed in many waysrecovery of services. Service users can be experts
and only that of a self-educated service user, withoutnot only about themselves but also services in general.
recovery - of the service and its staff, and serviceAlready we hear about very successful peer
users alike - there can be no empowerment andmentoring and other service user projects that support
without equality there can be no partnership worthy ofand train the mentally ill to recover each other. It isn't
the name. What does the service really mean bythat we want to remove you. We want to work with
these words and expect of itself, and of its users? Ifyou.
service users are genuinely empowered, how doesFor some it is tempting to criticise the mentally for
their relationship with themselves, each other and thedaring to hope for recovery. They are entitled to do
service and its staff change? Is partnershipso, but often these critics do not understand that most
synonymous with equality, or merely a new expressionmentally ill people are harsh self-critics and without
of an old hierarchy?good reason unlikely to give themselves the benefit of
When we use it in this new context, what do wethe doubt. Experience of mental illness of any severity
mean by "recovery"? Meta Services, an Americanbreeds poor self-esteem, corrupted confidence and
organisation who have helped pioneer mental healthfractured faith in oneself and life in general. Indeed,
recovery peer support, define recovery asmany of us don't have any faith in the idea of
"Remembering who you are and using your strengthsrecovery. Coming to recovery is, for many of us, a
to become all you are meant to be."road neither straight nor comfortable to tread, but even
Closer to home, England's campaigning advocates ofif it is a vain dream, recovery is one worth having.
recovery, rethink say, "Recovery can be defined as aWaking from it cannot be much worse than the
personal process of tackling the adverse impact ofnightmare of futility that many mentally ill people live in.
experiencing mental health problems, despite theirEmpowerment and partnership need not be
continuing or long-term presence. Used in this sense,complicated concepts in application, but firstly
recovery does not mean "cure""touchstones of humanity and simplicity. If you allow
There different definitions demonstrate that recoveryservice users to really be heard, to express what they
can mean many things. One of its defining qualities, sowant, and treat them foremost as people rather than
to speak, is just this diversity, where the individuality ofpatients, then the change necessary can happen
the experience and perception of recovery is reflectednaturally. I am not deluded enough - and believe me, I
in the variety of its definitions. In the same way, to theam no stranger to delusion - on this subject to think
degree that service users are empowered bythat a magic wand exists. What encourages me, on
services, they must empower themselves: bythe contrary, is that my own experience and that of
redefining their role, redefining their past, present andothers points to a process that can take root, grow,
future, and by redefining their recovery, in waysand then flourish in the hardest ground. And we say,
appropriate, different and meaningful. To the degreesimply, let us work with you more.
that service users are partnered by services theyOne way in which this can begin is by encouraging and
must partner - say, befriend - themselves and eachsupporting services and service users in questioning
other, and partner services, with a new sense ofthemselves and each other. It is still sometimes the
capacity, responsibility and potential.case that staff know little or nothing about those they
The degree of individual or collective service userlook after. It is essential that staff begin to talk with
involvement, assuming empowerment and partnershipservice users and not only to them. Interaction
as outcomes of same, is determined by answers tobetween staff and services and services users can
questions such as "Is the user involved in decisionsbegin to involve genuine. The mentally ill have stories to
about their own care or service plan?" Now, how dotell about themselves, each other and others not ill as
we answer this, honestly, in a context expanded bythey are that are worthwhile and revealing. The
empowerment and partnership priorities and in additionmentally ill, like some other marginalised and maintained
informed by a commitment to recovery? In myconditional members of society are often difficult to
experience - by no means definitive, I admit - care andunderstand and empathise with, relate to and relax
service plans are often subject to incompletion due toaround, but they are some of the most unusual, raw
time and caseload pressures on staff. Paperworkand paradoxically alive individuals you will encounter.
must be streamlined and possibly parts of it completedWhat matters most is that individuals be given the
by service users with minimal mediation; the latter hasopportunity and support and encouragement
usefully been done in the past. If the care plan is aboutnecessary to recover to the point of which they are
the service user then why shouldn't they support theircapable. Each recovery is unique and important, no
service by contributing to it with more than verbalmatter how it is achieved. Recovery is little evidenced,
answers? That's equality. It's empowering. It's realwhich is unfortunate because the skepticism about its
partnership, and without fanfare.reality might be challenged by in-depth, service-led
Another question asked is "Does the user have anystatistics. Service users must be heard, not just
influence over the way that these services are thenlistened to and patronised, both in an out of the service,
delivered?" The choice of the word "influence" hereand in a sense even more when they have left it for
intrigues me. Why should a service user have forevergreater health. How did they do it? What combination
to be satisfied with merely "influencing" serviceof personal, professional, medical and other factors
delivery? Shouldn't empowerment bring real partneringsupported or triggered what is often genuinely a
in service development and the active encouragementtransformation?
of the training and employment of service users in theRecovery is, in a sense, a map that creates itself as it
service?is used. There is an initial design, but it reveals itself as
Empowerment and partnership are, for me, precursorsplastic and mutable. Recovery is a chameleon and just
to and also the results of recovery. And powerful toolsas some mental illness is characterised by a knotty
to give service users but, if you like, recovery is theand detrimental shifting of shapes of identity, so in a
engine room where they can really gain steam.more positive way recovery is in part a process of
I didn't always think this. In fact, I came to the idea ofongoing reinvention and metamorphosis. It asks a great
recovery by accident. At a time of resurgent illness,deal of us but can repay in kind. And there are many
casting around for empathy and support, Isurprises. The recovery map has another side. As it
unexpectedly found myself on a webpage devoted toleads us to increased wellness and accommodation
service user articles, including those by influentialwith ourselves and the world outside our minds, it also
pioneers such as Pat Deegan, Helen Glover and Wilmacan hold threats: as we get better, it is not always
Boevink. Having heard nothing of recovery, I wondered:obvious or easy in what ways we live with our
Why weren't all service being exposed to this hopeful,emergent recovered selves. We have more
healing and most of all self-actualising message? Whyself-awareness, more responsibilities - to ourselves
wasn't this material available as a matter or priority toand others - and more risks to take. This is why I feel
service users? And why wasn't local practise -it is important to work with recovering (and other)
because elsewhere it has grown and grown into aservice users in a way that can acknowledge, without
formidable force for practical, tangible change - lined upvalidating, their doubts and fears. For example, where a
with such a powerful context for good?relapse occurs, which can often signal a significant dip
It has become my conviction that embracing thein self-confidence and belief in the recovery process, it
recovery context and process is, at this time and forcan be acknowledged - without defeatism - that it has
some time to come, the best chance mental healthhappened and had even severe consequences. What
staff, services and service users have of transformingshouldn't happen is a validation thereby that it is able to
the way we look at, live and work with mental illnessderail recovery. This attitude is essential to master for
and transform it into sustainable mental health.both the one recovering and those supporting them.
Empowerment and partnership should be synonymousOne way or another we're all going to recover and
with recovery. I am not interested in being empoweredthat includes local mental health services. The
or partnered on principle. I am interested in being wellnecessity of recovery will ensure this outcome. The
and acting from that with new intent. This assumesonly question is: how fast?
new strength. Do service users have such strength?Equality can take many forms. Lately I have asked
I have had the unusual role, for a service user, ofmyself: What is the service that I am offering that you
co-facilitating recovery trainings to local mental healthare using? My service is that I am mentally ill, I am open
service staff. It's worth noting that in itself this is ato you, I permit myself to be treated and supported by
powerful example of how services are changing, andyou... I am therefore clear that you are also my service
that I am grateful for the opportunity it gave me tousers. I want it acknowledged for all service users that
meet and share experiences with local mental healthjust as we use the service, so the service uses us.
staff, many of whom I know are now actively involvedAnd this gives a basic equality.
with embracing and creating the recovery context forEmpowerment and partnership are given meaning
and with their service users. At one point, during oneprimarily by practical and simple measures. By making
training, when discussing care plans, staff presentservices users, in essence, part of the service, but in a
were asked what strengths they feel service usersnew, more active and dynamic role. The primary
possess and demonstrate. Silence ensued, with theobjective of empowerment and partnership can only
dozen or so staff at best bemused, at worstbe this kind of shift. If only the service changes, no
indifferent. As the sole service user in the room, andmatter how dramatically for the better, there will still be
although generally benign on my service and treatment,imbalances. The service will be better, which is good,
I became irate. Were those engaged with commitmentbut the service users will still only be its beneficiaries,
and caring for the mentally ill really at a loss to identifywhich may also be good but which does little to
any strength in them? Even to many working for theirelevate them from a position of dependence and
welfare and interested in serving them better, are thetypes of inferiority. And it's crucial that we develop in
mentally ill fundamentally helpless, the occasional,parallel, and accept that service users are not at the
incidentally admirable "survivor" notwithstanding?moment widely aware of or enthused by a new
Many, including those who treat and support them- andrecovery context. So we need to be patient with each
the mentally ill themselves, frequently - see theother, too. Most of us in the service still need it. This
mentally ill as weak. Yet survival of serious mentalwhole exercise is about reframing, not rejecting.
illness, living with it and recovery from it summonThat's why, in order for real change to take place,
honesty and resourcefulness, coping strategies andservice users have to empower and partner each
adaptations bespeaking invention and determination,other meaningfully. These mutually empowered service
uniqueness and just plain stubbornness. There isusers then have a foundation and strength able to
nothing weak about the mentally ill. Strangely, thesupport growth of equality with the service. Many feel
struggle by the individual against their illness - supportedthis is unworkable, but ways are now being innovated
or not - confers upon them a degree ofto make this possible and they are succeeding.
empowerment in itself. (As for an analogy forOne of the most popular lately is "peer mentoring". This
partnership in this situation, well, as one bipolar, I canembodiment of mutuality. simply facilitates giving and
say with equanimity that it comes from none otherreceiving help and support with respect based on a
than one of my three selves.) The mentally ill can have,shared experience. In the UK organisations like the
therefore, a strange kind of freedom services andScottish Recovery Network and Recovery Devon
staff don't; this is why we should be talking to eachproduce similar definitions. Peer mentoring presumes
others as equals and partners, not only to be equitable,empathy, which is vital to service user healing. As
but to learn from each other and merge theservice users we can expect and experience much
experience and knowledge we share. I know that thissympathy from staff and medical professionals but
is happening more and more and has to an extentrarely, if ever, empathy. It's not fair to expect from
always happened; now it needs to become practise.those whose experience does not include our own, it
Over the recovery trainings I was taken, unexpectedlywould be patronizing and disingenuous, at best
and spontaneously, on a journey of great personalcontrived. From each other it is natural. Understanding
significance and professional value. It caused me tothrough the personal experience of having "been
re-evaluate and examine all of my experience sincethere", genuine engagement, sharing personal recovery
my diagnosis. It made me wonder: All the time we areexperiences: these are all powerful ways service
told that mental illness is on the rise, more areusers can support and empower each other. Focusing
depressed, stressed, anxious, more self-medicate,on each person's strengths and potential or actual
self-harm. Mental health care costs are set to risewellness and promoting recovery through relationship
steeply. Soon more than half the population of thisand friendship, these are ways to make ourselves
country will be statistically mentally ill. And then, who willbetter and stronger, and able to participate fully as
the mentally ill be? More and more of us seem to bepartners.
and claim to be mentally ill, if only mildly depressed.The next step might be peer mentoring programs
Once the mentally ill are definitively in the majority wewhere those with lived experience of mental illness
will be able to say that truly the lunatics have takenmentor fellow service users. The two-way traffic here
over the asylum. And what will that mean for thoseis simple and effective, as the specialist's own
who run the asylum? Who dictate its policy andrecovery is strengthened through service. These
procedures? It's a question I lay open to you. Wherementors or peer support specialists help others
will we be, and what will mental illness be? We will berecover through engagement, hope, and mutual
living a world of mental illness, not a world with mentalrelationship and friendship. And this helps the
illness. The fundamental distinction that has informedorganization and system recover. Moving from "mental
mental health care for generations - that there arepatient" to colleague redefines our roles and
more of "us" than "them" - will have gone. We willboundaries. Significantly, as staff work alongside
finally be equal and this knowledge will slowly butpeople in recovery, staff find new hope.
inexorably alter our relationship to each other.It's time there was more awareness of national and
Whenever service users become well and areinternational developments in service user involvement.
recovering there are ripples and resonances felt byIn England, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and abroad in
those around, and this includes in services. As theCanada, the United States, New Zealand and many
service user becomes more stable, strong andmore practical application of the ideas of
confident, services, staff, family and friends andempowerment, partnership and the reality of recovery
partners all feel it and may question themselves. For allare often far advanced by comparison with our own.
concerned this is a constructive process, if at timesDelivering services around the needs and wants of
disconcerting, and where the service is concerned it isservice users; embedding service user involvement in
yet another instance where the processes of themental health commissioning and whole service
service user mirror their service, in the sense that asredesign; involving service users in setting goals and
the service empowers and partners service users, itsoutcome measures and delivering user led services: all
role will be questioned, challenged and transformed, too.of these can be considered.
It is this mirror process that has so much to teachEmpowerment is not just an idea, it is essential. Let's
service users and their service about what they havesee services empowered - self-empowered - to
in common and share, usually without even realising it.change. Let's have real partnership, between agencies,
Recovery will pull in the service and force it to recoverand between services and its service users. Ideals
its perspectives and preconceptions. Empoweringmay be comforting, and reality harsh, but we service
service users is a great aim, and partnership a crucialusers are no strangers to harsh realities. For some of
outcome, but if it is going to be truly meaningful thenus, it has formed almost all of our experience.
the service has to be aware that what is being askedRecovery is not just a model or a process or a
is not just change for its own sake or even for theconcept or a practise or a context. Recovery does
service users' sake, but change for the sake of annot happen just through services, as in the case of
important principle: service users are equal now. This isservice users, but also to services. It is a necessity for
what I mean:service users and their best and most realistic hope
Just as, at the moment, the service is only justfor restored happiness and new wholeness. If we will
awakening to and acknowledging its need to recover,take this journey together - the best hope for a new
service users are likewise only becoming widelyway or working and being with your service users -
aware of the need for seeking their own recovery.the opportunity to recover ourselves and each other is
Neither is at fault. In order to work effectively with theirhere. I know we can do it, and in fact today, being
service, service users must take ownership of theirhere, it's clear we have already begun.