Challenges of High Conflict Divorce on Children

According to researchers, approximately thirty percentcertainly higher than the overall average, it is also not
of all divorces have periods of intense parent tonearly high as has been speculated at times in the
parent conflict. These parents are the biggest causepast.
for their children's struggles with divorce. When parents4. Substance abuse increases the risk of violence, and
are in high conflict divorces, children suffer. Thethus the risk of maladjustment for children. While this is
research clearly supports this basic fact. It is thesecommon sense, it needs to be stated. When there is
families who also end up in the court system, and areabuse in the home, there is an increased risk of
often engaged with Child Protective Services or withviolence. It is unclear as to the precise degree that
mental health professionals.substance abuse puts children at risk in a high conflict
These are also the families who often cause the mostsituation. Yet we do know that substance abuse
distress for family court judges, law guardians,increases the risk of violence.The risk of violence
matrimonial attorneys, and mental health professionals.increases the threat to children.
Often, these families contain parents who struggle withWhat can we do?
depression, substance abuse, personality disorders, andAs professionals working with high conflict families, it
a wealth of dysfunctional patterns.often feels as if our hands are tied with regard to
Mental Health Professionals who have worked withprotecting children. Most of us have probably
these families are aware that the intense conflict isexperienced frustrating efforts to educate parents
unhealthy for children, yet it can be helpful to gainabout the need to reduce their volatility, and yet find
clarity about the degree to which such high conflictchildren exposed to repeated episodes of conflict or
puts children at risk.violence. Nonetheless, it appears that certain guidelines
As you read this, please be careful NOT to minimizecan be put in place, which helps to reduce the risk of
the fact that a range of factors have been associatedexposure. These include:
with the struggles of children following divorce. Yet,1. Keeping high conflict parents apart. The easiest way
there are a number of consistent findings whichto prevent conflict with these volatile families is to
demand that we pay greater attention to the role ofmake certain that their exposure to one another is
intense conflict upon children.limited. These are the situations which often require
Why? Because we can do something about thismutual exchange points, the use of family members to
before the effects are so devastating for children.assist in exchanges, and the absence of direct
In this article, I will not offer an exhaustive review ofcontact. While it is somewhat appealing to argue that
the research. Instead, my focus is upon the intensecounseling should help these parents deal with one
impact of conflict, and the options that we have toanother, it is also true that many of these families have
potentially help children in these situations.emotional or psychological disorders, and simply do not
1. Parent to parent conflict is bad for children. There isseem to learn or benefit from treatment. If the focus is
some findings in the divorce literature that can bethen upon protecting children, it is essential to simply
debated. This is one which simply cannot bekeep these families apart.
questioned. The data are overwhelming (Ayoub,2. When volatile parents are still together, encourage
Detsch and Maraganore, 1999) (Amato & Keith,rapid solutions that protect the rights of both parents.
1991) Research is also clear that as the level of conflictThere are times when highly volatile parents remain
increases, so do the difficulties that children experiencetogether as they engage in their legal struggles. At
(Sales, Manber and Rohman, 1992). These findings aretimes, these situations involve histories of spousal
clear not only for post divorce relationships, but thisabuse. At other times, they are simply highly volatile
also applies to intact family situations. When there issituations with many episodes of screaming and yelling.
increased parental conflict, children's adjustmentsAll of these are harmful to children. When prioritizing
deteriorate.the needs of children, it can be helpful to remain
2. Parental conflict is more of a threat than is thecognizant of the ongoing damage that this does to
divorce. There is a growing body of literature whichchildren. When constantly keeping this in mind, I can
argues that divorce does create challenges forthen comfortably encourage parents to establish
children. Yet, when handled well, these are challengesschedules which avoid their direct contact with one
which children tend to adjust to in a reasonable fashion.another. When there is a long history of sustained
What children are not able to handle is the conflictconflict, there is little reason to believe that this will
between parents. Again, this is upheld in the researchchange without the benefit of some substantial period
that looks at intact families, where violence or extremeof time.
conflict in the home is one of the most reliable3. Find children treatment with a trauma specialist.
predictors of poor adjustment by a child.Children who are exposed to intense conflict or
3. Witnessing violence between parents is powerfullyviolence in the home often end up with diagnostically
unsettling. Children who witness violence between theirsignificant symptomology. Many parents are in denial of
parents are clearly at greatest risk for futurethe need for treatment. Yet, the research would
adjustment difficulties (Amato & Keith, 1991; Ayoubsuggest that the exposure to such situations are
et al, 1999; Jekielek, 1998)In fact, it appears that thetraumatic to children. When approached as such, there
witnessing of violence in the home opens up themay not be the need for ongoing long term supportive
source of fear and concern for children that is difficultcounseling. Instead, treatment from a specialist
to overcome. While ongoing exposure is clearly theprepared to handle trauma can be the most effective.
most traumatic, even exposure to a single episode ofWith many of the more encouraging intervention
violence is potentially traumatic to children. It isstrategies available, treatment does not need to be a
important to note that there is some literature thatrelentless series of sessions with a therapist who
suggests that children who witness violence in therepeatedly reviews the history of trauma, and the child
home become at greater risk of being victims ofwho grows increasingly disinterested in counseling.
physical abuse themselves.The bottom line here is quite simple. When there is
However, the findings in the literature vary greatly oncredible indications of violence, and children have been
this variable. However, Apple and Holden reviewedexposed to this, there is the utmost urgent need to
thirty one studies of the co occurrence of spousalhelp get children out of these situations. The more we
abuse and physical abuse (1998). They found a fortydo so, the more symptomology will be eliminated.
percent co-occurrence. Thus, in situations whereWhen this is combined with effective treatment,
children are witnessing spousal abuse, there appearsfocused on reduction of the traumatic memories, then
to be a forty percent risk of child abuse. While this ischildren can heal.