Abuse By The System

Similar to psychiatric diagnoses, individuals who do notknow the child have left him to be in a subdued,
understand my conceptions of the need for a'zombie-like' state.
paradigm shift in the field of mental health are prone toThis is one of only countless similar stories related to
ascribe labels. The common label I have received is tome. Are we expecting that this type of 'treatment' is
be part of 'anti-psychiatry'. First, similar to Laing, I do notsupposed to evoke some sort of 'cure'? To whose
deny the value of aiding individuals undergoing mentalbenefit is this sort of 'treatment', and what do we
distress, rather I disagree with the means to carry thisexpect the exact outcome to be? Where is the child's
out and am opposed to means that would beexperience heard in the midst of this 'treatment'. It
oppressive, forced, coercive, or do not respect theappears that the child who was abused has only been
autonomy and dignity of the individual.abused further by the system under the guise of 'help'.
It is my view that merely seeing the emotional world ofThe bottom line is money. The complaint has always
individuals as chemical accidents rather than examiningbeen that psychotherapy and human services are
experience is a misguided and mistaken approach.costly and time consuming. But what we fail to realize
Thus, I can view current psychiatric practice as akin tois that these drugs are not only expensive in
a materialistic religion, and it often has become thethemselves but expensive in their cost on human lives.
replacement for spirituality today. My other objectionTo actually address the core root of the child's distress
comes in that whereas we may find things to have anmay take some time, but would produce an outcome
evidence base, we also need to be reality based-far better than making the child a life long mental
science must always be tied with ethics and thepatient required to take toxic drugs for an indefinite
premise of to first do no harm. Because we canperiod of time. It is also unfortunate that disadvantaged
scientifically validate something does not always meanfamilies are often lured into the psychiatric system
it is ethical and good.because for many it is seen as one of few ways out.
What has becoming particularly distressing is to seeThe government provides money for a psychiatric
within psychiatric practice, that a 10 minute or lessdiagnosis, its cheaper to pay out these checks than to
interview with information solely obtained from sourcesreally invest in programs that would address the needs
who in some instances may have their own agendasof children and tackle issues of poverty and social
can produce live long labels and scripts for oftenjustice. And yes, there sadly do exist some parents
dangerous drugs. One example that a colleaguewho in selfishness would prefer to have their child
related is that a mother who has many abusiveconsidered to be incapacitated (though they are not)
relationships had a child who began acting out after hethan to actually address the reasons for their distress.
himself was a victim of abuse. The communicationIf labels must be used, I would prefer to use
between the mother and child was poor and the home'post-psychiatry' and in this what I mean is that the
environment was frequently chaotic. The history ofentire system must be deconstructed. The medical
trauma was never explored in a less than 10 minutemodel must vanish and be replaced with a model
interview, and the child was placed on multiplewhich takes into account the experiences of individuals
psychiatric drugs which teachers and others whoand which ties science with ethics.