| SCOPE-ANNAMALAI PSYCHOLOGY JOURNAL, DECEMBER | | | | indicates low e-culture. The reliability and |
| 2006, Vol.2, p:1-7. | | | | validity co-efficient for this inventory were |
| | | | found to be highly significant at 0.001 |
| INTRODUCTION | | | | levels. |
| | | | |
| Electronic technology is changing our | | | | (2)Sensation seeking behaviour scale |
| life-style to a great extent. There are many | | | | |
| areas of electronic technology helping | | | | This brief measure of the sensation seeking |
| different sections of a common man. For | | | | scale traces its origin to the sensation |
| instance, terms like e-commerce, e-business, | | | | seeking scale (SSS Form V) developed by |
| e-banking, e-mails, e-organizations, | | | | Zuckerman (1978). The aim of this scale is to |
| e-governance, e-journals, e-books, | | | | assess the sensation seeking level, which is |
| e-medicine, internet, web-shopping, etc have | | | | defined both as a personality trait as well |
| become part of the current lexicon. Advances | | | | as a need. This scale consists of 13 items; |
| made in the fields of information and | | | | each item has two statements 'A' and 'B' |
| communication technology (ICT) and | | | | pertaining to activities indicating low and |
| electronics has resulted in the emergence of | | | | high sensation seeking. The respondents are |
| e-culture. Electronic culture is enveloping | | | | expected to choose one of the two statements |
| the entire world, it is a global phenomenon. | | | | which suits them more by circling either "A' |
| Today e-culture is the reality that we live | | | | or "B". This scale is a self-report and |
| in; it is no longer an option. Kanter (2001) | | | | unidimensional. The responses of this scale |
| indicates that organization will successfully | | | | are grouped into 2 categories. One category |
| meet the challenges of the 'Internet Age' | | | | comprises of 8 items: 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 11 |
| only if they become communities of | | | | and 12, the responses of 'A' for these items |
| collaborative work relations with distinct | | | | is given a score of 1 and the 'B' responses |
| 'e-cultures.' | | | | are given of 0 scores. The other category |
| | | | comprises of 5 items: 4, 6, 9, and 13, the |
| E-culture is also increasingly understood as | | | | 'B' responses are given a score of 1 and the |
| a new digital media culture or digitalization | | | | responses 'A' are given 0 scores. The maximum |
| of culture. Netherlands council for culture | | | | possible score that can be obtained by an |
| in its advisory report on digitalization of | | | | individual in this scale is 13 and minimum is |
| culture submitted to the state secretary of | | | | 0. High score in this scale indicates high |
| education, culture and science (2004) defines | | | | sensation seeking and low score indicates low |
| e-culture as "all about a new, digital | | | | sensation seeking. Zuckerman suggested the |
| dimension; a new and -until recently- | | | | following interpretation for this scale: 1-3 |
| undreamt of medium with which existing | | | | very low sensation seeking scores, 4-5 low |
| culture must seek to interact and in which | | | | sensation seeking scores, 6-9 average |
| new culture is being generated." De Haan and | | | | sensation seeking scores, 10-11 high |
| Huysmans (2002) states the term 'e-culture' | | | | sensation seeking scores and 12-13 very high |
| refers to the diffusion of new technology, | | | | sensation seeking scores. |
| its application for various purposes | | | | |
| (especially information and communication) | | | | (3) Cultural determination scale |
| and shifts in related attitudes, values and | | | | |
| norms. Patel and Rajendran (2005) have | | | | This scale was developed and standardized by |
| defined "electronic culture" as "increased | | | | Chauhan (1985). The purpose of this scale is |
| use of electronic goods by individuals in | | | | to assess cultural determination. This scale |
| various areas"; they have also developed an | | | | indicates conformity and rebellion towards |
| inventory to measure e-culture. In this | | | | culture in India. The revised version of this |
| research study e-culture was assessed based | | | | scale used for this investigation has 40 |
| this perspective. | | | | items pertaining to Indian culture with 7 |
| | | | responses each (7 point scaling technique), |
| E-culture is both technological and a social | | | | namely, 'fully,' 'too much,' 'much,' |
| development. There seems to be a widespread | | | | 'average,' 'less,' 'very less,' and 'not at |
| consensus that new digital and networking | | | | all.' It is a unidimensional measure high |
| technologies like the World Wide Web (WWW) | | | | score indicates cultural conformity and low |
| and the Internet have the capacity to reorder | | | | score indicates cultural rebellion. The |
| the domains of everyday social and personal | | | | reliability and validity co-efficient values |
| life by transforming work and knowledge | | | | yielded for this scale were significant. The |
| forms, gender and body politics, health and | | | | constructor of this scale has determined the |
| science, domestic life and entertainment as | | | | reliability co-efficient by the test-retest |
| well as transforming national economics and | | | | method which was 0.74 and the validity |
| international relations, democracy and the | | | | co-efficient was determined with ratings of |
| distribution of power (Dona Kolar-Panov, | | | | neighbours knowing the elements intimately |
| 2003). The positive approval of the concepts | | | | which was 0.63. This scale consists of 40 |
| of information society and e-culture are | | | | statements; this is a 7 point scale. Each |
| reflected in the keenness with which | | | | statement is followed by 7 responses, namely, |
| political decision-makers have taken them | | | | 'fully,' 'too much,' 'much,' 'average,' |
| over on all levels- local, regional, national | | | | 'less', 'very less' and 'not at all'. The |
| and transnational. More accessible and | | | | response category carries a weight age of 7 |
| transparent information is an easy | | | | to 1scores from 'fully' to 'not at all'. The |
| expression, something that is unequivocally | | | | maximum score an individual can obtain in |
| good. It is good both from the point of view | | | | this scale is 280 and the minimum score |
| of social resources and democracy. | | | | possible is 40. High score in this scale |
| Furthermore, the ideas of an information | | | | indicates cultural conformity and low score |
| society and e-culture have also implied or, | | | | indicates cultural rebellion. |
| at least to start with, did imply | | | | |
| expectations of economic growth and | | | | Procedure |
| stability, opening up of new sectors of | | | | |
| production, increased productivity and the | | | | The samples of this study were personally and |
| advent of a new, fluctuation-proof economy | | | | individually contacted by the researcher and |
| (Mitchell, 2003). The emergence of e-culture | | | | data was obtained through face-to face |
| leads to cultural homogenization and immense | | | | interview. The duration of data collection |
| concentrations of financial power thereby | | | | were spread over a period of one month (30 |
| sending the threatening message "learn | | | | days). The obtained responses were scored and |
| English and buy a computer or you're out" | | | | statistically analyzed. |
| (Marsh, 2003). E-culture also makes it | | | | |
| imperative to develop digital skill that is | | | | RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
| to possess knowledge concerning the handling | | | | |
| of electronic products especially the use of | | | | The objective of this research study is to |
| computer and Internet (De Haan & Huysmans, | | | | explore the relationship of e-culture with |
| 2002). | | | | cultural determination and sensation seeking |
| | | | behaviour. For this purpose Pearson's product |
| E-culture in India is not different from the | | | | moment correlation were calculated, since no |
| international scenario. India certainly is | | | | significant gender differences were found |
| getting transformed into an e-society. The | | | | results for both sexes are combined and given |
| world's largest democracy (India) is perhaps | | | | in Table 1. |
| one of the most uniquely positioned countries | | | | |
| in the world. Although India is a developing | | | | It is inferred from the results summarized in |
| country, its wealth of information, | | | | Table 1 that e-culture does not have any |
| resources, and knowledge capacity immediately | | | | significant relationship with cultural |
| puts the country on the list of top 5 | | | | determination but is positively and |
| countries in the world. India is also one of | | | | significantly related to sensation seeking |
| the poorest countries in exposing their | | | | behaviour. |
| content on the global platform using digital | | | | |
| media. Except TV, among all other medium | | | | The concept of cultural determination assumes |
| India and its information assets are weakly | | | | that culture determines behaviour. The |
| represented. However, the scope of India's | | | | outcome of this research appear contrary to |
| strength in this direction is immense. The | | | | this assumption, the findings indicate that |
| government of India as well as many NGOs are | | | | e-culture is not influenced by culture, |
| dedicated and determined to enrich and | | | | culture conformity and culture rebellious |
| enhance the e-status of India. Osama Manzar's | | | | behaviour are not related to the use of |
| (2005) book "The Best E-contents 2005" | | | | electronic products. E-culture appears as a |
| published by 'Digital Empowerment Foundation' | | | | Tran cultural phenomenon, it seems to |
| (DEF) is an eye-opener regarding the | | | | influence people irrespective of their |
| e-contents in India. The Digital Empowerment | | | | cultural background. |
| Foundation (DEF) has a mission to make India | | | | |
| an information-rich country and thereby | | | | Table 1: Showing the Pearson's moment |
| enrich the world about India's ancient | | | | correlation co-efficient for e-culture with |
| knowledge, skill and its cultural diversity. | | | | cultural determination and sensation seeking |
| DEF understands that because of the content | | | | behaviour. |
| gap, the digital divide exists and therefore | | | | |
| its foremost mission is to narrow the content | | | | Variables r |
| gap using information technology (IT), | | | | |
| information and communication technology | | | | Cultural determination 0.034 |
| (ICT) and Internet as means. | | | | |
| | | | Sensation seeking behaviour 0.154** |
| Culture and personality are interrelated (see | | | | |
| Culture-and-Personality studies. Encyclopedia | | | | ** significant at 0.001 levels |
| Britannica. 2006). Psychological processes | | | | |
| and cultural norms influence one another | | | | *significant at 0.005 levels |
| (Lehman et al, 2004). Recognizing the | | | | |
| importance of culture in shaping personality, | | | | This study reveals a positive and significant |
| Allport (1961) was quick to point out that | | | | relationship between e-culture and sensation |
| individuals actively select their own way of | | | | seeking behaviour. The finding of this |
| life that suits their traits, temperaments, | | | | research indicate that high sensation seeking |
| values, and philosophy of life. Since | | | | behaviour is related with high e-culture and |
| e-culture has evolved as a dynamic new medium | | | | low sensation seeking behaviour is related to |
| of information, entertainment and commerce | | | | low e-culture. High sensation seekers exhibit |
| and demands change in life-style, people | | | | preference for high arousal, and physical |
| exhibiting culture conforming or culture | | | | pleasure and posses an urge for novel |
| rebellious behaviour and high or low novelty | | | | experiences (Oishi et al, 2001), since |
| seeking or sensation seeking trait may tend | | | | e-culture is highly interactive and is |
| to be influenced by it. | | | | creative in presenting the traditional |
| | | | culture in new digital forms providing people |
| Culture plays an important role in the | | | | with plethora of novel stimulation and |
| determination of behaviour and in the | | | | infinite source of information, high |
| development of personality is the basic | | | | sensation seekers tend to be more receptive |
| assumption of the concept of cultural | | | | to it. |
| determination (see Chauhan, 1985). Acceptance | | | | |
| of culture can be measured through conformity | | | | CONCLUSION |
| or deviant behaviour. | | | | |
| | | | The present study reveals that cultural |
| Sensation seeking, as described by Zuckerman | | | | determination is not related to e-culture but |
| (1994) is a "trait involving the seeking of | | | | sensation seeking behaviour is positively and |
| varied, novel, complex and intense sensations | | | | significantly related to e-culture. |
| and experiences." Researches on sensation | | | | |
| seeking have accumulated robust evidences for | | | | REFERENCE |
| a strong link between sensation seeking and | | | | |
| the preference for high arousal, and physical | | | | Allport, G. (1961). Patterns and growth in |
| pleasure (Oishi et al, 2001). The personality | | | | personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart and |
| trait of sensation seeking tend to influence | | | | Winston. |
| an individual's adjustment and reaction to | | | | |
| socio-cultural changes, in general high | | | | Chauhan, N.S. (1985). Manual for Cultural |
| sensation seekers in their urge for novel | | | | Determination Scale. Meerut: MAPA. |
| experiences will be more receptive to | | | | |
| cultural innovations. | | | | Culture-and-Personality Studies. Encyclopedia |
| | | | Britannica. Retrieved May 3, 2006, from |
| PURPOSE OF THE STUDY | | | | Encyclopedia Britannica 2006 Ultimate |
| | | | Reference Suite DVD. |
| E-culture though popular and prevalent, is a | | | | |
| recent phenomenon, studies on it appear | | | | De Haan, J and Huysmans, F. (2002). |
| remote and negligible both at international | | | | E-culture: An Empirical Exploration. The |
| and national levels. The scientist community | | | | Hague: Social and Cultural Plan Bureau. pp. |
| has just begun to recognize the importance of | | | | 145-155. |
| e-culture and its influence. At present there | | | | |
| are no much substantial empirical evidences | | | | Dona Kolar-Panov (2003). Cautious Optimism |
| available on the impact of e-culture. Even | | | | for eCulture in Europe. In S. Dragojevic., D. |
| the 'concept of e-culture' currently is | | | | Dodd., B. Cvjeticanin and C. Smithuijsen |
| tentative and far from conclusive. Researches | | | | (Ed)(2005): E-Culture: The European |
| on e-culture now are only at the beginning of | | | | Perspective- Cultural Policy, Creative |
| a long process. Reviews indicate that studies | | | | Industries, Information Lag (From the |
| on e-culture are fragmented and inadequate. | | | | proceeding of the round table meeting, |
| Scanty information is available about the | | | | Zagreb, 24-27 April 2003). Zagreb: Institute |
| effect of e-culture on social and cultural | | | | of International Relations. pp. 99-106. |
| development. There are no much scientific | | | | |
| tools and methods visible to study e-culture. | | | | Kanter, R. M. (2001). Evolve! Succeeding in |
| Only recently, the International research | | | | the Digital Culture of Tomorrow, Boston, MA: |
| community has started showing interest in | | | | Harvard Business School Press. |
| exploring e-culture. In India, unfortunately, | | | | |
| the research efforts in understanding the | | | | Lehman, D. R., Chiu, C and Schaller, M. |
| status of e-culture have still not gained | | | | (2004). Psychology and Culture. Annual Review |
| momentum. The research and academic community | | | | of Psychology. 55. pp. 689-714. |
| are dormant regarding the influence of | | | | |
| e-culture. An examination of related | | | | Marsh, J. B. T. (2003). Cultural Conflict in |
| literature in Indian context indicates that | | | | the Information Society. In S. Dragojevic., |
| e-culture has received poor attention. Hence | | | | D. Dodd., B. Cvjeticanin and C. Smithuijsen |
| this investigation is an attempt made to | | | | (Ed) (2005): E-Culture: The European |
| understand the relationship between e-culture | | | | Perspective- Cultural Policy, Creative |
| and the psychological variables of cultural | | | | Industries, Information Lag (From the |
| determination and sensation seeking | | | | proceeding of the round table meeting, |
| behaviour. | | | | Zagreb, 24-27 April 2003). Zagreb: Institute |
| | | | of International Relations. pp. 21-30. |
| METHOD | | | | |
| | | | Mitchell, R. (2003). Information Society and |
| Sample | | | | E-culture: On the Rise and Popularity of the |
| | | | Concepts. In S. Dragojevic., D. Dodd., B. |
| The sample for this study comprised of 100 | | | | Cvjeticanin and C. Smithuijsen (Ed)(2005): |
| students (50 females and 50 males) randomly | | | | E-Culture: The European Perspective- Cultural |
| selected from Annamalai University, | | | | Policy, Creative Industries, Information Lag |
| Chidambaram Taluk in Cuddalore District, | | | | (From the proceeding of the round table |
| Tamil Nadu. The age range of the sample were | | | | meeting, Zagreb, 24-27 April 2003). Zagreb: |
| between 18 to 24 years (Mean Age= 22.1 | | | | Institute of International Relations. pp. |
| years). | | | | 9-18. |
| | | | |
| Tools used | | | | Netherlands Council for Culture. (2004. |
| | | | English Edition). From ICT to E-culture: |
| The research tools used in this study for | | | | Advisory report on the digitalization of |
| data collected were the (1) e-culture | | | | culture and the implications for cultural |
| inventory, (2) Brief sensation seeking | | | | policy (Submitted to the Netherlands State |
| behaviour scale, and (3) cultural | | | | Secretary for Education, Culture and Science, |
| determination scale, selected after a | | | | June 2003). The Hague: Netherlands Council |
| comprehensive review of related literature. | | | | for Culture Publishing. |
| | | | |
| (1) E-culture inventory | | | | Oishi, S., Schimmack, U and Diener, E. |
| | | | (2001). Pleasures and Subjective Well-Being. |
| This inventory was developed by Patel and | | | | European Journal of Personality. 15. pp. |
| Rajendran (2005) to measure e-culture. The | | | | 153-167. |
| inventory consists of 42 items with 2 | | | | |
| responses, i.e., "yes" and "no" respectively | | | | Osama Manzar (2005). "The Best of E-contents |
| for each item. The 42 items are classified | | | | 2005." Delhi: Digital Empowerment Foundation |
| into 4 areas, namely, home=16 items, | | | | (DEF). |
| office=11 items, personal=8 items and | | | | |
| public=7 items. The score for 'yes' in home | | | | Patel, J. M. A and Rajendran, K. (2005) |
| area is 2, in office is 1, in personal area | | | | E-culture Inventory. SCOPE- Annamalai |
| is 3 and in public area is 1 were as the | | | | Psychology Journal, Vol. I, pp. 1-11. |
| score for 'no' in all the areas is 0. The | | | | |
| maximum score possible in this inventory is | | | | Zuckerman, C. (1978). "The Search for High |
| 74 and the minimum score is 0. High score | | | | Sensation." Psychology Today. Sussex |
| indicates high e-culture and low score | | | | Publishers, Inc. |