Hawthorne Effect, An Examination

Abstractdo not necessarily support the theory, "The results of
The "Hawthorne Effect' was extrapolated from, andthese experiments indicated not only that experimental
some years after, research performed by Professorgroups who worked with progressively greater
Elton Mayo and his team, in the Hawthorne plant ofillumination produced more (which was fully expected)
Western Electric, between the years 1927 and 1932.but that groups produced more who did not have
The research attempted to measure the effect ofmore illumination, and indeed even those groups whose
changing physical setting of working conditions on staffillumination was progressively decreased produced
performance. It is suggested that the Hawthornemore. Whatever the relation between illumination and
Effect affects outcomes because the subjects of anproductivity, it could not be disentangled from the
experimental intervention are aware that they areinfluence of other variables. No detailed interpretation
being observed and because they are receiving extraof these seemingly contradictory results was,
attention. Experts are divided on the veracity of thetherefore, attempted."
Hawthorne Effect, whilst others accept the conclusion,Adair et al (1989) performed a set of 86 experiments
but reject the experiments as an unsuitable means forto test the Hawthorne Effect, from which they
proving it.concluded, "there was no evidence of an overall
The Hawthorne EffectHawthorne effect. The mean effect associated with
Professor Elton Mayo of Harvard University led aHaw¬thorne manipulations was non-significant,
team of researchers that conducted a series ofand hence such groups essentially could be regarded
experiments at the Hawthorne plant of Westernas no different from a no-treatment control. Moreover,
Electric, at Cicero Illinois, between the years 1927 anda detailed analysis of these studies by their control
1932.procedure, and subsequently by other moderator
Robbins (1988) says that the Hawthorn Effect wasvariables, also revealed no systematic trends to
not derived at the time the studies were performed,suggest a specific artefact to pose as an alternative
but was extrapolated later from the results of threeconcern."
groups of illumination experiments carried out atOthers suggest that the Hawthorne Effect is no more
Hawthorne. These results are often offered as proofthat a legend, for example Occupational Medicine
of the theory.(2006), quoting Gale EAM. The Hawthorne studies-a
The suggestion is that increasing illumination levels forfable for our times? Q J Med 2004;97:439-449, states
the experimental group resulted in increased"These at least seem to be the main facts behind the
performance, but subsequent and significant reductionspopular legend, although these particular experiments
in illumination levels, produced further increases inwere never written up, the original study reports were
performance, thereby proving that a group underlost, and the only contemporary account of them
examination will perform better simply from thederives from a few paragraphs in a trade journal'."
knowledge that they are being observed, and becauseDespite concern with the veracity of the Hawthorne
of special attention they receive from management,Effect however, if is still often quoted in contemporary
researchers and peers. That is the effects onresearch, for example Tan (2004) on the Effects of
performance are psychological.Background Music on Quality of Sleep in Elementary
Harris (2002) gives a synopsis of the Effect, as isSchool Children, "Another explanation for the significant
generally accepted, "The Hawthorne Effect wasexperimental effect could be attributed to a
formulated during the first time-management study,Hawthorne effect. In other words, there is a possibility
circa 1932, that included employee opinions andthat subjects might be responding to the treatment
preferences.due to their awareness of participation. This might also
Psychologists, at the Chicago-based Hawthorne Plantbe the explanation for why subjects in the control
of Western Electric, employed a variety ofgroup also showed improvement in their sleep quality."
interventions to improve employee morale andSo whether the Hawthorne Effect actually exists or
productivity (Diaper, 1990). Independent variablesnot is uncertain, but even if it does, it is not viewed by
included variations in levels of lighting, roomsome as a valid conclusion from the original
temperature. and length and scheduling of rest periods.experiments performed at Hawthorne, even if they
Improved morale and increased productivity werecould be found.
observed, temporarily, in response to each of theReferences
interventions. Consequently, it was concluded that theMerrett, Frank (February 2006) ":Reflections on the
experiment, itself, i.e., interest in and involvement of theHawthorne Effect", "Educational Psychology" Vol 26,
employees, induced positive attitudinal and behavioralNo. 1, University of Birmingham, UK, pp143-146
responses. The outcomes of the experiment becameAdair John G, Sharpe Donald, Huynh Cam-Loi (1989)
known as the Hawthorne Effect, i.e., any change in the"Hawthorne Control Procedures in Educational
physical environment or social interaction that includesExperiments: A Reconsideration of Their Use and
input by the target audience is likely to induce, at leastEffectiveness", University of Manitoba Vol. 59, No. 2, pp
temporarily, measurable changes in attitude or215-228
behavior."(May 2006) "Occupational Medicine" Vol.56 Iss 3,
Adair et al (1989), quoting Adair (1984), isolated theOxford:, p217
features of the methodology that led to the Effect,Hatch Mary J (1997) "Organisational Theory", Oxford
"Examination of Hawthorne control practices ofUniversity Press pp241, 242
educational researchers indicates that three salientRobins Stephen P (1988) "Management Concepts and
features of the original studies have been identified asApplications, Second Edition", Prentice Hall pp41, 42
the primary source of the methodological artefact: theTan, Leepeng P (Summer 2004) "The Effects of
special attention subjects received from theirBackground Music on Quality of Sleep in Elementary
observers and supervisors; awareness of theirSchool Children", Journal of Music Therapy, 41, 2, pp128
participation in an experiment; and the novelty or uniqueHarris, Charles m. (summer 2002) "is multimedia-based
features of the experimental activity (Adair, 1984)."instruction Hawthorne revisited? Is difference the
However Merrett (2006) suggests that thedifference?
experiments results from the Hawthorne experiments